Monday, March 4, 2013
Sydney Thiessa Post #3
In the documentary Miss Representation, I found that the statistic "only 16% of protagonists in film are women" to be the most interesting to me. As a film enthusiast and a person who wants to pursue a career in film, I found this upsetting. Film is mostly a representation of society and how life is portrayed in the real world. Since realistically, society is male-dominated, it makes sense, but is disappointing, that film would be male-dominated as well. In that 16% of female protagonists, most of them are not strong and independent women, but are motivated by relationships and love and are displayed as weak. This is common in romantic comedies where the central focus is a love-related challenge, like She's Out of My League, in which the female protagonist only existed as a character to change the male protagonist's life and bring him out of his funk with her love. But even when they are strong and independent, they are the "fighting fuck toy" archetype, as mentioned in the documentary. This is common action films that are primarily for male audiences. These female protagonists only exist for male titilation, because males find it arousing for a woman to shoot guns and beat people up, like in The Avengers, in which the only female protagonist was attractive with a curvy body and long hair and was stronger than many of the other male characters. A lot of films that have a more progressive representation of women are independent and foreign films which don't get a lot of attention in American society, specifically Hollywood. I hope that with the influence of more female directors, like myself, film will become more meaningful instead of being mindless entertainment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sydney,
ReplyDeleteYou write, "As a film enthusiast and a person who wants to pursue a career in film . . . I didn't know you wanted to work in film. What are you pursuing? Are you taking any film classes here?
I think this statement could be fleshed out a bit more: "Film is mostly a representation of society and how life is portrayed in the real world." The ever-present dilemma: "art imitates life" (i.e., is mimetic) or things work the other way around (art/media actually create trends and cultural standards, and thus life imitates art). This is an oversimplification of these relationship used simply for the sake of online discussion. Do you think film is always mimetic, then?
"Since realistically, society is male-dominated . . ." For such statements, try to use associated terminology (i.e., "society is phallocentric . . . ")
Well put here: "But even when they are strong and independent, they are the "fighting fuck toy" archetype, as mentioned in the documentary. This is common action films that are primarily for male audiences. These female protagonists only exist for male titilation, because males find it arousing for a woman to shoot guns and beat people up, like in The Avengers, in which the only female protagonist was attractive with a curvy body and long hair and was stronger than many of the other male characters." I rarely watch this kind of film, but I'm familiar with many of the titles. I can't say I'd ever spent much time analyzing the "fighting fuck toy", but, even without having seen these films, I find she's really right on about this. Angelina Jolie's Lara Croft, whatever Megan Fox's character is in Transformers, Scarlett Johannsen (sp?) as . . . Black Widow? Someone? So very formulaic.
Whose work do you like? (i.e., female directors, or male directors/writers who create interesting female characters)